@prologic Oh no, i'm pretty sure if devrel or sales from one of these companies ever called me, my end if the conversation would be much better summarized by this: http://txtpunk.com/foac
Low stakes hot take: the most important good things in git were already in rcs. rcs→cvs→svn→git is better overall at each step, but the benefit/complexity ratio gets worse at each step and most things git gets used for would be fine with rcs+patch.